Choose to Lose with Meta
Choose to Lose with Meta
Why did BEUC file a complaint against Meta?
BEUC filed a complaint against Meta with the Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Network after changes rolled out to Facebook and Instagram services in the EU in November 2023 requiring users to either consent to the processing of their personal data for advertising purposes or pay to avoid advertisements. BEUC considers this pay-or-consent approach unfair under EU consumer law.
What is BEUC’s complaint against Meta based on?
BEUC’s complaint against Meta is based on the following practices of concern:
- Meta is partially blocking the use of Facebook and Instagram until users have selected one option or the other, which constitutes an aggressive practice under European consumer law.
- In addition, many consumers likely think that, by opting for the paid subscription as it is presented, they get a privacy-friendly option involving less tracking and profiling.
- Meta provides misleading and incomplete information to consumers which does not allow them to make an informed choice.
- Given the market power of Meta's Facebook and Instagram services in the EU and the very strong network effects of social media platforms consumers do not have a real choice because if they quit the services they would lose all their contacts and interactions built over the years.
What is the real impact on consumers?
The real impact on consumers is that they are faced with a mandatory choice in order to continue using Facebook and Instagram, which undermines their ability to make a free and informed decision. Consumers may also be misled into believing that paying for an “ad free” option offers greater privacy, while their personal data continues to be collected and used for purposes other than advertising.
Which BEUC members and consumer organisations took part in this action?
The following BEUC members took part in this action: Асоциация Активни потребители (Bulgaria) ), dTest (Czech Republic), Forbrugerrådet Tænk (Denmark), Que Choisir Ensemble (France), EKPIZO & KEPKA (Greece), Adiconsum (Italy), Latvijas Patērētāju interešu aizstāvības asociācija (Latvia), Vartotojų aljansas (Lithuania), Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs (Luxembourg), Consumentenbond (The Netherlands), Forbrukerrådet (Norway), Federacja Konsumentów & Fundacja Konsumentów (Poland), Spoločnosť ochrany spotrebiteľov (S.O.S.) ZPS (Slovenia), Asufin & CECU (Spain), Sveriges Konsumenter (Sweden).
What action is BEUC calling for in its complaint against Meta?
BEUC is calling for the CPC Network to take action on Meta’s practices. At the very least, Meta should:
- Stop saying that the unpaid option is ‘free’,
- Not confront people with the choice between a very expensive, ad-free, seemingly more privacy-friendly option and having their behaviour tracked and profiled,
- Give consumers the possibility to think about their choice (for example by adding a “decide later” button)
- Be explicit about what data the tech giant will continue to collect and share under the paid option).
PRESS RELEASE | Consumer groups red card Meta’s latest pay-or-consent policy, January 2025
SUMMARY REPORT | BEUC assessment of Meta’s latest pay-or-consent policy for Facebook and Instagram users, January 2025
LETTER | January 2025
PRESS RELEASE
Authorities back consumer groups in taking action against Meta pay-or-consent policy
22 July 2024
PRESS RELEASE
Consumer groups file complaint against Meta’s unfair pay-or-consent model
30 November 2023
EXTERNAL ALERT
External alert about Meta’s new paid subscription scheme for ad-free services on Facebook and Instagram
November 2023
REPORT
An assessment of Meta’s new paid-subscription model from a consumer law perspective
November 2023

Meta’s ‘Consent Or Pay’ Model Challenged In EU
Forbes (30 November 2023)
“According to the European Consumer Organisation, BEUC, providing this choice falls foul of EU consumer law and amounts to unfair commercial practices."
L’abonnement de Facebook et Instagram peut-il être jugé illégal en Europe?
RTL (30 November 2023)
“Around twenty civil society groups are attacking Meta after it put in place a payment option for consumers to avoid having their data collected for advertising reasons.”
Meta enfrenta una denuncia colectiva europea por su nueva suscripción de pago: «Es injusta e ilegal»
ABC (30 November 2023)
“The deputy director general of the European Consumer Organisation, Ursula Pachl, stated that the choice the tech giant offers currently to consumers us unfair and illegal.”
EU-Verbraucherorganisationen reichen Beschwerde gegen Meta ein
ORF (30 November 2023)
“Consumer advocates criticise the fact that users cannot use Facebook or Instagram until they have made their choice.”
Facebook et Instagram payants : des associations européennes de consommateurs déposent une plainte contre Meta
Le Monde (30 November 2023)
“...European consumer groups are opening a new front in the war against Meta’s new subscription options.”
Consumatori UE contro Meta, ‘modello abonnamento ingiusto’
ANSA (1 December 2023)
…”it constitutes an aggressive practiceunder consumer law”…
Entreprises - L’abonnement payant à Facebook : le chant du cygne du modèle économique des Gafam
Le Soir (2 December 2023)
…Illegal, misleading, extortionate…the complaints are rolling in from around Europe…
Zlevníme Facebook a Instagram, dušuje se Meta kvůli regulátorům
Novinky (20 March 2024)
…Meta uses dishonest, deceptive and aggressive practices…
The European Consumer Organisation
Europäischer Verbraucherverband
Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs